Re: Too many PMC implementations

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:40:20AM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
 > I saw the thread [Re: Sample based profiling] on tech-userlevel@, I'm not
 > subscribed to this list but I'm answering here because it's related to
 > tprof among other things.
 > 
 > I agree that it would be better to retire gprof in base, because there are
 > more powerful tools now, and also advanced hardware support (PMC, PEBS,
> ProcessorTrace).

Speaking of old ratty tools, got a plan for replacing gcov? :-)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost