Re: python libraries vs. RPATH (vs. RUNPATH)

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 01:10:14AM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> This works on a recentish current where lib-dynload/readline.so has
> RPATH instead of RUNPATH.
> 
> I vaguely remember we had a bit of a discussion abour RPATH
> vs. RUNPATH a few years ago.  Does anyone remember off-hand if the
> relevant fixes made it to -8?

Not offhand but I knew where to look ;-)

RCS file: /cvsroot/src/libexec/ld.elf_so/headers.c,v
Working file: headers.c
head: 1.70
[..]
	netbsd-9-2-RELEASE: 1.65.2.1
[..]
	netbsd-8: 1.61.0.8
[..]
----------------------------
revision 1.65
date: 2018-12-30 12:55:15 +0100;  author: martin;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -2;  commitid: OsrLtEI8DqY6KO5B;
branches:  1.65.2;
Add support for DT_RUNPATH - it is just the same as we always have treated
DT_RPATH.  Approved by core.
----------------------------

and according to my grep in 8's doc/CHANGES-* it has not been pulled up.

Martin