Re: RT linker, rpath and security

To: Rhialto <rhialto%falu.nl@localhost>
Subject: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
From: tlaronde%polynum.com@localhost
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:46:27 +0200

Le Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:36:36PM +0200, Rhialto a écrit :
> On Thu 11 May 2023 at 10:22:08 +0200, tlaronde%polynum.com@localhost wrote:
> > Does ELF have a variant that enforces specifying the "full" pathname of a
> > library to be loaded ("full" but only relative to sysroot if this is supported)?
> 
> Yes, it is possible to specify the full path name of a library instead
> of merely the soname. I have argued for this before and you might find
> some mails from me in (probably) current-users where I experiment with
> that a bit.

Thanks! I will look for them: I'm definitively interested in this
feature.
-- 
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                     http://www.kergis.com/
                    http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C

References:
- RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Rhialto

Prev by Date: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Next by Date: Re: [and paxctl] RT linker, rpath and security
Previous by Thread: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Next by Thread: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index