Re: RT linker, rpath and security

To: tech-toolchain%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 14:52:08 +0200

Am Fri, May 12, 2023 at 01:42:15PM +0200 schrieb tlaronde%polynum.com@localhost:
> But the best solution is at the core, IMHO.

It sounds to me that you should just switch to statically linked
binaries...

Joerg

References:
- RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Mouse
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: Lloyd Parkes
- Re: RT linker, rpath and security
  - From: tlaronde

Prev by Date: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Next by Date: make -d C no-op?
Previous by Thread: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Next by Thread: Re: RT linker, rpath and security
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index