Re: <bsd.own.mk> variable naming convention for compiler warnings

[Luke Mewburn <luke%mewburn.net@localhost>]

On 23-06-01 21:37, Christos Zoulas wrote:
  | In article <E43DFF3E-3CDD-4987-A10A-77B6AD08D3CC%me.com@localhost>,
  | Jason Thorpe  <thorpej%me.com@localhost> wrote:
  | >
  | >> On May 31, 2023, at 4:46 AM, Luke Mewburn <luke%mewburn.net@localhost> wrote:
  | >> 
  | >> Thoughts?
  | >
  | >Big improvement, IMO.
  | 
  | I agree!

I've updated <bsd.own.mk> and tools/compat/* to the new convention.

I haven't converted much of the tree to it at this point.
IMHO, the priority should be adapting any Makefiles that
build HOST_ tools and need overrides for the native build.

It is for further study to whether we adapt our existing builds of
warning suppression (-Wno-foo) to specific non-fatal warnings that are
printed (-Wno-error=foo).  Feedback from other developers is that there
are some directories where there has been an analysis to explicitly
suppress warnings (-Wno-) versus show them non fatal (-Wno-error=).