Checking library symbols

[Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-userlevel%mumble.net@localhost>]

[bcc tech-toolchain, followups to tech-userlevel to stay in one place]

Every now and then we have some embarrassing bug with accidental
removal or exposure of symbols in a shared library.  This has been a
constant problem with libm (e.g., https://gnats.NetBSD.org/57960,
https://gnats.NetBSD.org/57881, https://gnats.NetBSD.org/56577) but it
can also affect other libraries too.

The attached patch creates a build-time mechanism to audit libraries
for unintentional symbol changes with bsd.lib.mk:

- To opt in, you write down a sorted list of all the symbols (and, if
  applicable, version suffixes) expected to be defined by a library
  LIB=foo in foo.expsym.

- When the library is built, bsd.lib.mk will use nm(1) to generate a
  sorted list of symbols actually defined in libfoo.so(.M.N), and diff
  it against foo.expsym.

If there are differences, the build will fail and the differences will
be printed.  Only symbol names and versions are checked, not addresses
or types.

This check is orthogonal to writing a version map: it doesn't require
changing the library itself to opt into symbol versions
(https://wiki.NetBSD.org/symbol_versions), and it checks for missing
symbols too which ld doesn't check for even if they're written in the
version map.

So far this is experimental -- I only tried it with openssl libcrypto
to verify another experiment with renaming sha2 symbols.  It's limited
to shared libraries, not static libraries, for now.  In practice we
might require more mechanism to handle MD variation in the set of
defined symbols (especially with libm), and we might encounter other
problems I haven't foreseen if we try to apply this to more libraries,
but I thought I'd share a first draft.

Thoughts?

>From aa30c139d6874d9f7733484474e804622f0b0dce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:53:41 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] bsd.lib.mk: Check expected vs actual symbols at build-time.

If, for LIB=foo, you create a file foo.expsym, bsd.lib.mk will list
the dynamic symbols and their versions with

nm --dynamic --extern-only --defined-only --with-symbol-versions

and compare the names (not addresses or types) to foo.expsym.  If
there are any differences, they will be printed and the build will
fail.

foo.expsym should be sorted with `LANG=C sort -u'.

This way, you can verify changes don't inadvertently add or remove
symbols.  If you do want to add (or, if you're bumping the major,
remove) symbols, you can verify the changes and edit the foo.expsym
file accordingly.  This will also help to enforce rules about symbol
changes on pullups in release branches.

Note that using a version map (-Wl,--version-script=...) doesn't
catch symbol removal -- ld quietly ignores symbols in the version map
that aren't actually defined by any object in the library.  So this
supplements the version map.
---
 share/mk/bsd.lib.mk | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk b/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
index 4db7809dda40..9df4bcc834f3 100644
--- a/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
+++ b/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
@@ -648,6 +648,26 @@ ${_LIB.so.full}: ${_MAINLIBDEPS}
 	${HOST_LN} -sf ${_LIB.so.full} ${_LIB.so}.tmp
 	${MV} ${_LIB.so}.tmp ${_LIB.so}
 
+# If there's a file listing expected symbols, fail if the diff from it
+# to the actual symbols is nonempty, and show the diff in that case.
+.if exists(${.CURDIR}/${LIB}.expsym)
+realall: ${_LIB.so.full}.diffsym
+${_LIB.so.full}.diffsym: ${LIB}.expsym ${_LIB.so.full}.actsym
+	${_MKTARGET_CREATE}
+	if diff -u ${.ALLSRC} >${.TARGET}.tmp; then \
+		${MV} ${.TARGET}.tmp ${.TARGET}; \
+	else \
+		ret=$$?; \
+		cat ${.TARGET}.tmp; \
+		exit $$ret; \
+	fi
+${_LIB.so.full}.actsym: ${_LIB.so.full}
+	${NM} --dynamic --extern-only --defined-only --with-symbol-versions \
+		${_LIB.so.full} \
+	| cut -d' ' -f3 | sort -u >${.TARGET}.tmp
+	${MV} ${.TARGET}.tmp ${.TARGET}
+.endif
+
 .if !empty(LOBJS)							# {
 LLIBS?=		-lc
 ${_LIB.ln}: ${LOBJS}