At Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:14:29 +0900, PHO <pho%cielonegro.org@localhost> wrote: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS > > On 1/16/25 03:32, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > > I've never ever been comfortable with not knowing all dependencies > > explicitly, including the transitive dependencies of intermediate > > libraries, at build time. The main program's build really should know > > all the dependencies its product(s) will have, not just the "front-line" > > ones. > > ...even if some programs need this, and > failing to maintain the list of > dependencies (including their ordering) > does not always cause an error? Indeed there's currently no error or warning. I'm saying there should be. -- Greg A. Woods <gwoods%acm.org@localhost> Kelowna, BC +1 250 762-7675 RoboHack <woods%robohack.ca@localhost> Planix, Inc. <woods%planix.com@localhost> Avoncote Farms <woods%avoncote.ca@localhost>
Attachment:
pgpgsjjz6ZLYb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature