>> I'd like to propose a switch to symlinks by default, possibly for 1.4 but
>> I'm not holding my breath on that.
>
>I think I'd prefer to keep the hard links.  Either that or "go back" to
>using ".so" instead of any kind of links.  It's awfully hard to screw up
>anything with ".so" copies if you suddenly want to give a particular
>copy its own unique text at some point.

the only problem here is that a .so link to another man page that's
compressed (the target, not the link itself) doesn't seem to work.  i,
at the very least, get interesting garbage.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."