"Charles M. Hannum" wrote:

> 
> So, there are several ways in which the `new' malloc(3) is quite slow:
> 
>  [ ... ]
> 
> Does anyone want to work on this?  I don't really have time, but I
> think it's important to fix some of these problems.

I'll have a look at this today - I had some other planned NetBSD work
that is on hold :-)

Simon.