Subject: Re: portmap=no, nfs_{client,server}=yes
To: Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
From: David Brownlee <abs@mono.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 11/19/1999 16:50:08
OK, the weight of opinion has convinced me :)
Proposal:
- If any portmap dependent service is enabled without
portmap, syslog a big warning, and disable service.
- Add a comment in rc.conf by each portmap dependent
service to the effect it needs portmap enabled.
David/absolute
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > I would agree with you if the default was portmap=YES, but in
> > -current the default is portmap=NO.
> >
> > The argument now is that if I set 'nfs_client=YES' it should
> > start everything needed to work as an nfs client.
> >
> > I still support having an extra 'WARNING:' in this case, but
> > I would expect it to start portmap.
>
> I really, really object to it starting portmap unless it's been
> specifically requested. It's better to have a system default to
> being secure, and have the novice spend an hour trying to figure
> out why it doesn't work, than to have it default to insecure, save
> the novice an hour, and have a compromised machine later on.
>
> I say put in the warning, add a question to the FAQ, and live with
> the queries this generates on the mailing list.
>
> cjs
> --
> Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> 917 532 4208 De gustibus, aut bene aut nihil.
> The most widely ported operating system in the world: http://www.netbsd.org
>