Subject: Re: update(8)
To: None <hwr@pilhuhn.de>
From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 11/25/1999 00:52:36
I believe the trickle-sync changes are independent from the
softdep, (so update dies even without softdep :)
David/absolute
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> Simon Burge wrote:
> |I'm going through the install tools deleting references to update(8),
> |and notice that we still build and install it. Is this right or an
> |oversight?
>
> I think update is still needed for systems that don't use softupdates
> So as long as softupdates can be disabled, we should build update.
> Or am I totally wrong?
>
> --
> See <a href="http://www.netbsd.org">NetBSD</a> for a multiplatform OS
> Koennen wir jetzt die Prinzipienreiterei lassen und uns wieder den
> wirklich wichtigen Dingen zuwenden?
> -- Tilman Schmidt in de.admin.news.groups
>