On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, matthew green wrote:
>    This reads to me like a requirement on the design, not a specification
>    of how this system implements the requirement.  i'm looking for the
>    latter...
> 
> it implements it using exactly the same methods that /etc/rc does,
> right now (ie, 'checkyesno').  this work is 100% fully backwards
> compatible with the current rc.conf -- anything else would be
> completely unacceptable.

So instead of the old

	fiddle with /etc/rc(.local)

to get something added it's

	drop a file somewhere and
	fiddle with /etc/rc.conf

now. Um... didn't we want to avoid this?


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra