>> 	the patch is to make __ivaliduser() and __ivaliduser_sa() (in
>> 	lib/libc/net/rcmd.c, which is exported for lpd access control)
>> 	static functions.
>> 	do people think this is reasonable?  Makefile is a bit dirty.
>> 	this is to avoid filename conflict for pathnames.h.
>Besides your diff (checking not for _LIBC but notdef) not actually
>making them static, you should also consider remove the leading
>underscores which are no longer necessary; making them static already
>is an incompatible interface change, so renaming them isn't an issue
>either.
>
>Other than that, it looks fine to me.

	if we hide __ivaliduser(), compiled lpd binary will choke.  so I
	thought that we'd need to defer the "static" change until the next
	libc major # bump.  am I wrong?

itojun