> 	there were couple of comments, including:
> 	- just change UT_HOSTSIZE (no backward compat)
> 	- use extra plaintext file based on other OS's practice
> 	- ...
> 	and there seem to be no consensus.

- define an API!  
- use some other format other than a binary file of fixed-length
  records (that's just so COBOL) so that we won't have to grow the
  size again later.
- allow for increased username and line size as well as hostname size.
- possibly log other parameters?

						- Bill