Todd Vierling wrote:
> We should be moving toward a trend of having LKMs compilable *without a
> syssrc tree*, not the other way around.

I disagree.

Would you enlighten me how you'd like to build e.g. cd9660 LKM
without syssrc ?

I don't think we should install all kernel includes just because
'it might be needed by something'.

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>      http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
@@@@  Wanna a real operating system ? Go and get NetBSD, damn!  @@@@