Matthias Buelow wrote:
> >Yes, I suppose that would be okay. Though I wonder if realloc(3)
> >ever fails if the result is smaller than the original.
> 
> but that's an implementation-specific property of realloc() that
> lies outside the domain of *asprintf() and hence must not be relied
> on.

That's true. Go ahead with the *asprintf() change, then :)

Jaromir 
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>      http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
NetBSD - just plain best OS! -=*=- Got spare MCA cards or docs? Hand me them!