Subject: Re: /home and /usr/local
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 02/19/2003 09:08:35
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
| > There are a variety of issues with having /home and /usr/local
| > in the "base" set in NetBSD, including:
| >
| > * Those directories may often be (NFS) shared in a heterogenous
| > network, and a NetBSD installcreating and/or changing the
| > ownership and permission of these directories may not be
| > desired.
|
| You need a mount point -- having /home as a mount point or as a real
| directory is the same thing. There is no harm in having it.
You still do not address the other concern raised:
[...] a NetBSD install creating and/or changing the ownership and
permission of these directories may not be desired.
(A mount point does not solve this issue.)
| > * If these are symbolic links to other locations, pax will unlink
| > the symlink and replace the path with an empty directory.
|
| However, that's a general problem with our install.
I, too, would like our install & extraction mechanism was changed
so that it did not have the adverse behaviour with locally created
symlinks to directories. Solving that does not address the other
concerns.