Subject: Re: /home and /usr/local
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 02/19/2003 09:43:59
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:28:54PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
| Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org> writes:
| > You still do not address the other concern raised:
| >
| > [...] a NetBSD install creating and/or changing the ownership and
| > permission of these directories may not be desired.
| >
| > (A mount point does not solve this issue.)
|
| I don't understand the concern.
|
| You said the problem might be "/home is NFS mounted" -- well, if /home
| is NFS mounted, creating the directory causes no harm -- you need such
| a directory as a mount point ANYWAY. I don't understand your "(A mount
| point...)" comment.
[I thought this was clear in my comment, and in the context of the
rest of the /home and the previous /usr/local discussions. Obviously not.]
Using a mount point for /home, a symlink to another directory, or any
other method still does not prevent the extraction/installation from:
* Changing the ownership and permissions of /home or /usr/local
to what the default NetBSD installation has. (Or any other
locally maintained and likely to be shared directories which
are generally considered not specific to the operating-system.)
* Creating a missing /home, /usr/local, or any children of /usr/local.
Luke.