--zuE2pCA56U4I9Fhk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 09:20:12PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
  | > I consider it extremely risky to not have (remote) console access of
  | > a system that you are maintaining, whether the userland is fully
  | > dynamically linked or not; /rescue just makes the system more robust
  | > in that situation.
  |=20
  | Not really very.  You want to move sshd to /rescue - or at least link
  | it static - too?  Otherwise, you may well not have a shell to run
  | /rescue/su from.

FWIW: when I said "more robust in that situation" I was referring to
"fully dynamically linked or not", not "lack of remote console access".

--zuE2pCA56U4I9Fhk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFA2i9FpBhtmn8zJHIRAiA0AJ45USSZCAkz+XAsq30ZlVLZ6cuClQCgyHgM
uRMlZXRp8/rk4JZx7r5I8rA=
=+DQZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zuE2pCA56U4I9Fhk--