Subject: Re: Questions about iconv.h
To: T.SHIOZAKI <tshiozak@netbsd.org>
From: SODA Noriyuki <soda@sra.co.jp>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/28/2004 20:22:52
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:47:07 +0900 (JST),
"T.SHIOZAKI" <tshiozak@netbsd.org> said:
>> (No idea how to fix / work-around from me.)
> +/* For throw/catch expression. (c.f. ISO C++ 15.1/3, 15.3/1, 15.4/1) */
> +#ifdef __cplusplus
> +struct __tag_iconv_t {};
> +#else
> struct __tag_iconv_t;
> +#endif
> typedef struct __tag_iconv_t *iconv_t;
Isn't it better to fix this in AbiWord side by defining
UT_iconv_t as something different from iconv_t,
e.g. struct { iconv_t ic; }, or void *.
It seems the assumption in AbiWord is not portable.
For example, Solaris 9 uses a pointer to an incomplete struct
as iconv_t just like NetBSD.
--
soda