On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:11:39AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> On May 11,  8:06am, der Mouse wrote:
> } 
> 
>      BTW, if you really want to talk about brokenness consider GCC
> silently linking in extra libraries (i.e. libgcc_s.so) and not issuing
> the appropriate rpath option.  Now that's broken!
> 

This is why on solaris I patch gcc to at least push -R lines to the linker
for this as well. Now, why the GCC maintainers insist the broken behavior
is "correct" is beyond me...

James