--=-=-=


manu@NetBSD.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:

> Roland Dowdeswell <elric@imrryr.org> wrote:
>
>> We also need to resurrect the protocol 1 krb5 and protocol 2 krb5
>> support which OpenSSH removed.  I've been planning to do this when
>> I get a chance, but the chance has been taking a while to show up.
>
> How does that interract with PAM introduction? Does kerberos support all
> goes in PAM, or will we have bits remaining in sshd?

There will remain krb5 bits in sshd for legacy Kerberos protocol support,
those part that doesn't deal with password but rather the kerberos protocol
itself.

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (NetBSD)
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=dHDm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--