Subject: Re: static vs. dynamic runtime linking, and silly 'ld -L' breakage
To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/28/2005 04:56:10
>>> All AT&T UNIX System V Release 4 ports used only '-L',
>> This turns out not to be the case. The SVR4 linker does not default
>> the runtime search path to the -L arguments.
> I didn't just rely on my possibly foggy memories [...] -- I
> re-checked the old manuals I happen to have right handy here [...]
For this, I'd hesitate to depend on the manuals. After all, if you
were to believe the implications in the manpages, you'd think NetBSD's
-L sets the run path as well.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B