Subject: Re: static vs. dynamic runtime linking, and silly 'ld -L' breakage
To: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 01/30/2005 17:37:51
On Jan 30, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Greywolf wrote:
> I would have thought that *defaulting* -R to -L would have been
> perfectly
> reasonable for most cases; indeed, if you expect your link-time
> environment
> to differ from your runtime environment, you should have to say so.
>
> But that's just me, I guess.
Yes, it is. In a lot of environments, link-time and run-time are quite
different.
-- thorpej