-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Peter Postma wrote:

>spamd is not pf-centric, as was mentioned before by martin.
>IIRC it can be used without pf(4).

Actually, although pfspamd can indeed be used without pf(4), it _is_ 
pf-centric.  In particular, it's white- and grey-listing modes generate 
kernel pf tables which can only currently be used by pf(4).

So sure it can be used without pf, but it a.) is `pf's spamd' (i.e. the 
spamd which came with pf), and b.) is a pf-centric product.

So `pfspamd' should be just fine.  `spamd' is not acceptable in any 
case.
- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCW9KrpRpI6SYACmIRAogzAJ9oI/NXPxjIvLoMRVd1DIEQzpKmCgCbB5ox
ioc2MZDFFz3J3kAwVo06XhA=
=19Yi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----