On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:22:43AM +0200, Juan RP wrote:
> Attached is the patch with all your suggestions fixed, except the second
> suggestion (inconsistent spacing in multiple operators), I leave them as is
> because I think they are better to understand IMHO (der mouse said so
> too).
> 
> Note that the manpage might need a review (wiz, snj?).
> 
> Thank you to all for your comments.


Why the rename from scan_ffs to scanffs?
This seems inconsistent with other utilities, at least fsck_ffs.

-- 
Peter Postma