--==========1470312259FB8A494103==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

> As far as I've heared, the only thing added was the advertisement clause
> ("If you use our product, please say so in docs etc.").

So, it's some kind of BSD style license?

> I think one can hardly deny that to someone whose work you use, and =
refuse
> to give them the credits where they are due.

I agree everyone has the right to put his/her work under the license he/she =

likes.

The only thing I'd like to see is that we carefully revise the new license. =

I doubt that Debian/OpenBSD (and the others) would reject the inclusion of=20
XF4.4 if it has a sort-of a BSD license. Better to invest some time in=20
analysing the license before the import than having the problems=20
afterwards. If everything turns out to be OK then that's fine if it not=20
then we IMHO saved us worries and work... Better safe than sorry.

Cheers,
Marc

--==========1470312259FB8A494103==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAQ0N17YQCetAaG3MRAhNSAJ9o8gBtDnjn283L/6ZvIPdVlz6V8gCfY005
6espolBa+oQkNZ310YFLJWg=
=9mpN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==========1470312259FB8A494103==========--