Subject: Re: DRI [was: Re: more summer of code fun]
To: Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: tech-x11
Date: 06/24/2005 20:31:25
--Signature_Fri__24_Jun_2005_20_31_25_-0400_9BAagREiooJPC0W0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

> > I'm sure !=3D operators have been around before His Billness was born
> > - software patents should be busted by prior art just like any other
> > patents. And as far as I remember this operator patented by M$ had
> > some
> > specific enhancements to deal with classes so it won't affect C's !=3D
> > anyway.
>=20
> Well, I know this patent, and it's about the comparison of two
> pointers with the aim of finding out whether they actually point to
> the same memory. I think we're doing this pretty often. Think e.g.
> NULL pointer checks after malloc calls here.

Yes, but programmers around the world have been doing that for bloody
ages - if it's that trivial there should be plenty of prior art. Didn't
the /old/ SCO publish some 30 years old UNIX source some years ago,
just before Caldera bought them? It probably contains what you're
referring to ;)

have fun
Michael

--Signature_Fri__24_Jun_2005_20_31_25_-0400_9BAagREiooJPC0W0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQryl3cpnzkX8Yg2nAQJkDQgAk6o/m8PHmt7SXobIQbPmxtN6htbdh6xX
gUZz1P4ltXdEvIkL3JvfyJN+yHo/3vNcIyQXhL1pcMNL8wwE31Hu9GWhHlJH8XM2
q3ABiaw7nKGa8SgO4XJ7bF8Dxq1GgfkC86EeQCJtyjGRr0tORvhWVMUOPiS4Hpkr
jwAxDhj8uZIEm7yYTQpSJyyMcffboH/MiwbZHHWEZFw6u0H2eT2ZC47NJW97vbwl
q4byEG6e5Mc0eorQxGm8+i4HWFAqzSKS1AZ7NTGXFQ0s9/qmSHv7L+XsdzD0F9MU
xgHHcH20hbrcQ1fYIXLB08xqc6JkpuoQHuqtQoC4Zs2KiBbkmngYEg==
=BK6P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Fri__24_Jun_2005_20_31_25_-0400_9BAagREiooJPC0W0--