tech-x11 archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: prep (and bebox) xserver support
Hi! Bernd,
From: Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:20:25 +0200
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:19:09PM +0900, KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
> > Hi! Matthew and Michael
> > @@ -142,13 +144,15 @@
> >
> >
> > static PciChipsets S3PciChipsets[] = {
> > + { PCI_CHIP_864_0, PCI_CHIP_864_0, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > + { PCI_CHIP_864_1, PCI_CHIP_864_1, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > { PCI_CHIP_964_0, PCI_CHIP_964_0, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > { PCI_CHIP_964_1, PCI_CHIP_964_1, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > - { PCI_CHIP_968, PCI_CHIP_968, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > - { PCI_CHIP_TRIO, PCI_CHIP_TRIO, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > - { PCI_CHIP_AURORA64VP, PCI_CHIP_AURORA64VP, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > - { PCI_CHIP_TRIO64UVP, PCI_CHIP_TRIO64UVP, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > - { PCI_CHIP_TRIO64V2_DXGX, PCI_CHIP_TRIO64V2_DXGX,
> > RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > + { PCI_CHIP_968, PCI_CHIP_968, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > + { PCI_CHIP_TRIO, PCI_CHIP_TRIO, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > + { PCI_CHIP_AURORA64VP, PCI_CHIP_AURORA64VP, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > + { PCI_CHIP_TRIO64UVP, PCI_CHIP_TRIO64UVP, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > + { PCI_CHIP_TRIO64V2_DXGX, PCI_CHIP_TRIO64V2_DXGX, RES_SHARED_VGA },
> > { -1, -1, RES_UNDEFINED }
> > };
>
> Can you only add the two new lines and not change the other lines in this
> part?
Oops, please fix white-spaces these 5-lines beforehand. ;-)
> > @@ -609,6 +615,54 @@
> > pScrn->rgbBits = 8; /* set default */
> >
> > /* probe for dac */
> > + if (S3GENDACProbe(pScrn)) {
> > + pS3->DacPreInit = S3GENDAC_PreInit;
> > + pS3->DacSave = S3GENDAC_Save;
> > + pS3->DacRestore = S3GENDAC_Restore;
> > + if (pS3->RamDac->RamDacType == GENDAC_RAMDAC) {
> > + pS3->DacInit = S3GENDAC_Init;
> > + switch(pScrn->bitsPerPixel) {
> > + case 8:
> > +#if 0
> > + pS3->MaxClock = 110000;
> > +#else
> > + pS3->MaxClock = 95000;
> > +#endif
>
> What is the reason you are not using 110000 or 55000 further down?
> I would remove the three #if 0 parts.
> Maybe add a note that the MaxClock is reduced and what it should be.
hmm...
I also lost this reason. In my memory, I think that the source of the
old GENDAC support to which I referred did like this.
I can remove between #if 0 - #else. However I have not notes...
Thanks,
--
kiyohara
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index