Re: Alternative intel driver

[Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>]

Christos Zoulas wrote:
>In article <20150513075157.125FD30285B%ren.fdy2.co.uk@localhost>,
>Robert Swindells  <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
>>
>>I have local patches that allow the final version of the intel driver
>>with support for UMS to be built against the xorg server that is in
>>current.
>>
>>The netbook of mine that wouldn't work with KMS seems fine now.
>>
>>Is it still worthwhile importing it into the tree ?
>>
>>It could help with PR 49330 I guess.
>
>Append the patches to that PR?

Any patches would mostly be against files that are not in CVS, the
rest would be the build infrastructure stuff which is all working.

I don't really see the point of dumping work on somebody else by
putting it in a PR, the question is whether we want it or not.

Robert Swindells