Subject: Re: CVS commit: htdocs
To: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: www-changes
Date: 01/25/2001 00:02:37
>> XXX Why not use MACHINE_CPU rather than MACHINE_ARCH here? Does the endianness
>> XXX really matter?
>MACHINE_ARCH shows binary compatibility and MACHINE_CPU
>(which is not appeared yet in tree) will be used to show
>source compatibility.
(i can't seem to find the original email so maybe i'm confused)
MACHINE_CPU is declared in in bsd.own.mk, and the content is derived
from MACHINE_ARCH. basically the current definition of MACHINE_CPU
is for finding directories like lib/libc/arch/arm, for example.
(if there were some other plans, please update or whatever...)
itojun