On 01.03.2018 15:21, Maxime Villard wrote: > Le 01/03/2018 à 13:47, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : >> On 01.03.2018 13:43, Maxime Villard wrote: >>> Le 01/03/2018 à 13:36, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : >>>> On 01.03.2018 13:23, Maxime Villard wrote: >>>>> Module Name: wikisrc >>>>> Committed By: maxv >>>>> Date: Thu Mar 1 12:23:12 UTC 2018 >>>>> >>>>> Modified Files: >>>>> wikisrc/security: meltdown_spectre.mdwn >>>>> >>>>> Log Message: >>>>> Add ia64, not vulnerable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To generate a diff of this commit: >>>>> cvs rdiff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 wikisrc/security/meltdown_spectre.mdwn >>>>> >>>>> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the >>>>> copyright notices on the relevant files. >>>>> >>>> >>>> #gentoo-alpha: <creemj> ryan57: yes, Alpha (at least ev6 and later) is >>>> vulnerable to both Spectre and Meltdown attacks. >>> >>> What? ia64 is Itanium, not Alpha. Unless I misunderstood something? >> >> This is just another CPU worth mentioning in the list. > > Ah ok, I thought you meant that ia64 was actually vulnerable. > > Regarding Alpha, "ryan57" was probably talking about Alpha 21264 and above, > because that was (as far as I understand) the first model to do speculative > execution. > > But is there anything more official than this? I have no other source on Alpha AXP. It's sufficient to note that according to Gentoo Alpha community ev6+ are likely vulnerable to both attacks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature