Re: SSH -> Secure Shell renaming is not official.

To: Darren Moffat <Darren.Moffat%eng.sun.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: SSH -> Secure Shell renaming is *not* official.
From: Kevin Steves <stevesk%sweden.hp.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:33:51 +0100 (MET)

On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Darren Moffat wrote:
: I'm guessing here but the fact that there is a legal dispute going on
: might be the reason why some people are unable to express an opnion on
: wither or not to rename since by doing so it declares their companies
: position on the validity of the trademark.

no.

it is wrong to assume that someone posting with a some-entity.com
address represents some-entity's legal position on this matter, unless
the message clearly states that it does.

References:
- Re: SSH -> Secure Shell renaming is *not* official.
  - From: Darren Moffat

Prev by Date: Re: SSH-> Secure Shell renaming is *not* official.
Next by Date: Re: SSH-> Secure Shell renaming is *not* official.
Previous by Thread: Re: SSH -> Secure Shell renaming is *not* official.
Next by Thread: message lang tags verse SSH_MSG_KEXINIT
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index

Re: SSH -> Secure Shell renaming is *not* official.

Re: SSH -> Secure Shell renaming is not official.