Re: WG Last Call (third time's the charm?) for SSH core drafts

[Markus Friedl <markus%openbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:01:47PM -0500, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> > but I think it would be a mistake to proceed with it in the main
> > document as underspecified as it is.  A poor, ambiguous
> > specification is worse than none at all.
> 
> so, until recently, we had clear consensus to go forward with the
> admittedly woefully underspecified x.509 wording pending actual
> implementation experience.

since the existing x509 implementations are kind of broken,
we should not care right now.

> do we want more delay?

NO.