Re: WG Last Call (third time's the charm?) for SSH core drafts

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld%east.sun.com@localhost>]

> but I think it would be a mistake to proceed with it in the main
> document as underspecified as it is.  A poor, ambiguous
> specification is worse than none at all.

so, until recently, we had clear consensus to go forward with the
admittedly woefully underspecified x.509 wording pending actual
implementation experience.

do we want more delay?

					- Bill