IETF-SSH archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.

To: sommerfeld%Sun.COM@localhost, ietf-ssh%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman%Sun.COM@localhost>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:00:44 -0800

begin quotation by Bill Sommerfeld on 2003/1/10 18:47 -0500:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-13.txt
...
	All others are normative; note that I think RFC1766 has been
		superceded.


Yes, use RFC 3066 instead of RFC 1766.

               - Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld

References:
- still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld

Prev by Date: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Next by Date: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Previous by Thread: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Next by Thread: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index