IETF-SSH archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.

To: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman%Sun.COM@localhost>
Subject: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld%Sun.COM@localhost>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:09:24 -0500

> Yes, use RFC 3066 instead of RFC 1766.

Do you know if there are any significant over-the-wire differences
between 3066 and 1766 ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
  - From: Chris Newman

References:
- Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
  - From: Chris Newman

Prev by Date: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Next by Date: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Previous by Thread: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Next by Thread: Re: still need review of normative vs. non-normative reference split.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index