Re: IESG feedback on core drafts.

[Frank Cusack <fcusack%fcusack.com@localhost>]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:43:11AM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:04:04AM +0000, David Wagner wrote:
> > 
> > Do you really think there is any real-world case where this will come up?
> 
> Sure, I regularly copy terabytes of data around, data that is not
> encrypted but also not worth protecting.  The time cost of encryption
> is visible to me, partly for billing reasons.

Then again, anyone who is going to use 'none' is going to have really
good reasons for it.  There's no harm in discouraging it.  Part of my
argument was that it seems damn obvious that you shouldn't use "none".

/fc