Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.

[Jon Bright <jon%siliconcircus.com@localhost>]

Jon Bright wrote:

> If implementors shout at me about whether they support AES, rather than 
> everyone sending in a mail to the list, I'll be happy to correlate the 
> answers and send a summary tomorrow at about this time.

So, further to this - I doubt this list is anything like complete, but 
the following implementations all support AES.  Nobody mailed to say 
they didn't:

PuTTY
Dropbear
MindTerm
AppGate
All current Vandyke versions
PenguiNet

Peter Gutman didn't mail to say whether his implementation supports AES 
or not (since his policy is to support as little as possible, I guess 
he'd be the most likely candidate for non-support, hence the special 
mention).

Matt Johnston (DropBear) mentioned he might try and hunt down an SSH2 
implementation that didn't support AES.  He's not mailed to say he found 
anything, but that could just mean he hasn't had time yet.

Either way, it seems like making AES required won't cause problems for 
anyone.

--
Jon Bright
Silicon Circus Ltd.
http://www.siliconcircus.com