Re: subsystem name registry not mentioned in [SSH-NUMBERS]

To: Niels Möller <nisse%lysator.liu.se@localhost>
Subject: Re: subsystem name registry not mentioned in [SSH-NUMBERS]
From: Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:38:38 -0700

Niels Möller wrote:

Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost> writes:

4.9.5  Connection Protocol Subsystem Names

   There are no initial assignments of Connection Protocol Subsystem
   Names.



As far as I'm aware, there's one deployed subsystem name: "sftp". But
perhaps this isn't the right place to specify that? (I'm afraid I lost
track of sftp after the sftp/file-xfer/version exchange discussion
some months ago).


It is coming :-)  But slowly :-(

I believe that the registry can be created empty and SFTP will
ammend it.

Thanks,

Joseph

References:
- subsystem name registry not mentioned in [SSH-NUMBERS]
  - From: Ben Harris
- Re: subsystem name registry not mentioned in [SSH-NUMBERS]
  - From: Niels Möller

Prev by Date: Re: subsystem name registry not mentioned in [SSH-NUMBERS]
Next by Date: Re: tcpip-forward requests and bind addresses
Previous by Thread: Re: subsystem name registry not mentioned in [SSH-NUMBERS]
Next by Thread: Session channel extension to specify home directory?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index