Re: filexfer-07

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld%sun.com@localhost>]

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 00:25, der Mouse wrote:
> >> If an implementation needs multiple revisions of the draft (all do),
> >> then the cost is much higher.
> > The current draft allows you to skip implementating intermediate
> > versions.  (You have to implement at least version three so
> > extensions work.)
> 
> Except version three isn't documented, is it?  (Unless you're lucky
> enough to have a saved copy of the I-D for it from back when, that is.)

old versions of working group drafts are available from a multitude of
archives, and have recently been made available officially via an ietf
site.

in this case, look at:

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer/

						- Bill