Re: break extension draft revival?

[Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost>]

On Thu, 12 May 2005, Phillip Remaker wrote:

> If you wouild please just edit it with the IDNITS fixed and the Informative 
> references updated, I'd appreciate that and resubmit it to the WG.

I've done that, and put it at
<http://bjh21.me.uk/junk/draft-ietf-secsh-break-04a.xml> and
<http://bjh21.me.uk/junk/draft-ietf-secsh-break-04a.txt>.

I've also corrected various other problems (unexplained abbreviations, 
references in the Abstract, miscapitalisation of "Telnet", no reference to 
RFC 2119, no explanation of data types, incorrect informative/normative 
split, and maybe others) and put the result at
<http://bjh21.me.uk/junk/draft-ietf-secsh-break-04b.xml> and
<http://bjh21.me.uk/junk/draft-ietf-secsh-break-04b.txt>.

Use whichever you want, and I'm sorry for the delay in sorting this out.

--
Ben Harris