RE: Secure Shell WG: what's left?

["Richard Whalen" <Whalenr%process.com@localhost>]

> 
> draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-09
> 	what can I say but *sigh*.
> 	the complexity of this draft seems to be increasing,
> 	due largely to differences in philosophy between posix/unix and
> 	not-posix/unix filesystems.
> 

I prefer to think of this as adding functionality needed for interoperability that was ignored in earlier versions of this draft.

----------------------
Richard Whalen
Process Software