Re: publickey subsystem

To: Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: publickey subsystem
From: Jon Bright <jon%siliconcircus.com@localhost>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:10:04 +0200

Joseph Galbraith wrote:

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

We are decidedly well into the "home stretch".

Here's what's left on our plate:

draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem-02: standards track.
    Ready for WG Last Call?



I think so... I've kinda of lost track of this one.

Jon, what do you think, are we ready?

As far as I know, we're ready - but it could be I've forgotten someone'sissue.

I think we have several implementations of version 1
of this protocol-- I'm not sure how many we have of
the current version.


I've been meaning to get round to implementing it, but haven't yet.

--
Jon Bright
Silicon Circus Ltd.
http://www.siliconcircus.com

References:
- Secure Shell WG: what's left?
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: publickey subsystem (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
  - From: Joseph Galbraith

Prev by Date: Re: WG Chair Nits & start of WG Last Call: draft-ietf-secsh-publickeyfile-06.txt
Next by Date: Re: publickey subsystem (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
Previous by Thread: Re: publickey subsystem (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
Next by Thread: RE: Secure Shell WG: what's left?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index