Sara Golemon wrote:
If I had a complaint about this draft it'd be the lack of a changelog describing the differences from version 1. I had to use the openssh patch provided by vandyke as a reference to learn that version 1 doesn't use generic attributes in "add" and "publickey" packets, but does use an explicit comment field.
I'm not sure if such a changelog would be accepted - as I understand it, the drafts are supposed to document how things are, as opposed to how they were. I may be wrong in this.
Does this page help: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem/ The IETF didn't use to provide this information... I think it is very useful that they do now.Absolutely! Thanks for the resource!
Does this obviate the need for a Changelog, or did you mean that it's a useful resource, but we still need a Changelog?
-- Jon Bright Silicon Circus Ltd. http://www.siliconcircus.com