Re: x509-02 (was Secure Shell WG: what's left?)

To: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld%sun.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: x509-02 (was Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
From: Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:57:52 -0600

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

draft-ietf-secsh-x509-02: standards track
	very new.  needs PKI expert review.


This is very accurate reflection of this draft's
status.

Out of curiosity, is anybody implementing / planning
to implement this draft in the near future?

Anybody have any suggestions on how to catch
a PKI expert?

I'll send a plate of homemade chocolate chip cookies :-)

A bag of MMs?  Doritos?

Thanks,

Joseph

Follow-Ups:
- Re: x509-02 (was Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
  - From: Jeffrey Hutzelman

References:
- Secure Shell WG: what's left?
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld

Prev by Date: Re: filexfer (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
Next by Date: Re: publickey subsystem (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
Previous by Thread: Re: filexfer (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
Next by Thread: Re: x509-02 (was Secure Shell WG: what's left?)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index