Re: publickey subsystem (was: Secure Shell WG: what's left?)

[Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>]

Sara Golemon wrote:
> > > We are decidedly well into the "home stretch".
> > >
> > > Here's what's left on our plate:
> > >
> > > draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem-02: standards track.
> > >       Ready for WG Last Call?
> >
> > I think so... I've kinda of lost track of this one.
> >
> > Jon, what do you think, are we ready?
> >
> > I think we have several implementations of version 1
> > of this protocol-- I'm not sure how many we have of
> > the current version.
> >
> > Does anyone know of any open issues for this draft?
> If I had a complaint about this draft it'd be the lack of a changelog 
> describing the differences from version 1.  I had to use the openssh 
> patch provided by vandyke as a reference to learn that version 1 doesn't 
> use generic attributes in "add" and "publickey" packets, but does use an 
> explicit comment field.

Does this page help:

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem/

The IETF didn't use to provide this information... I think it
is very useful that they do now.

Thanks,

Joseph