filexfer: rationale style text in draft...

[Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>]

I've a question for you draft-writing pros...

Strewn throughout the filexfer draft are comments like the
following examples:

> However, to ease the burden of implementation on servers that
> use a single, simple, seperator sequence...

or

> Note that the name "supported2" is used here to avoid conflict
> with the slightly different "supported" extension that was
> previously used.

In addition, there is the 'change-log' section.

Am I correct in thinking that this kinds of 'rationale'
or 'history' type comments are not appropriate, and
should be removed?

Is there any official guidance on these kinds of things?

Thanks,

Joseph