IETF-SSH archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: New draft possibilities



On August 30, 2005 3:25:12 AM -0400 der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost> wrote:
A TCP tunnel would change the characteristics of most UDP apps quite
significantly and would not be desirable, I'd think.

Depends on what you're using UDP for.  It will change the
characteristics of UDP, but whether the change is significant will
depend on the application UDP is being put to.

For example, I would expect it to work fine for DNS traffic (which is
pretty close to the only use I can see for it offhand, though that
could just mean I don't do much with UDP).

But what happens when DNS times out and sends a retry, while TCP has
also queued it's own retry?  You end up drastically increasing the
amount of network traffic.  I fail to see how that's a Good Thing.
So I'm not sure what you mean by "works fine".

What happened or what were the general thoughts on this when X.25 was
prevalent?  TCP over X.25 is even more interesting than UDP over X.25.
Or were IP protocoles not really used over X.25?

-frank



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index