Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186

To: ietf-ssh%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186
From: der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:30:45 -0400 (EDT)

> SHA-512 is awkward to implement on non-64-bit processors

Hmm?  I didn't find it so.  It would have been awkward without an
at-least-64-bit integer data type, but, given that, it doesn't much
matter - well, not to awkwardness, at least - how much juggling the
compiler has to do behind the scenes to implement that data type.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

References:
- Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186
  - From: Peter Gutmann

Prev by Date: Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186
Next by Date: Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186
Previous by Thread: Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186
Next by Thread: Questions on X11 forwarding
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index